ANNEX 1

Shepherd and Swift 1887
SUBMISSION TO THE COMMITTEE OF INQUIRY
INTO HUNTING WITH DOGS
Part 2 Description of Coursing with Deerhounds
PREPARED BY THE DEERHOUND COURSING CLUB
FEBRUARY 2000
|
SECTION |
PAGE NO. |
|
|
1. |
3. |
|
|
2. |
4 |
|
|
3. |
4. |
|
|
3.1. |
5. |
|
|
3.2. |
5. |
|
|
3.3. |
6. |
|
|
3.4. |
7. |
|
|
3.5 |
8. |
|
|
4. |
8. |
|
|
5. |
9. |
|
|
6. |
9. |
|
|
7. |
10. |
|
|
8. |
11. |
|
|
9. |
11. |
|
|
10. |
12. |
|
|
10.1. |
Relevance |
12. |
|
10.2. |
Cruelty |
12. |
|
10.3. |
Released Hares |
12. |
|
10.4. |
Escape Avenues Blocked |
12. |
|
10.5. |
Hares Dying of Exhaustion |
12. |
|
10.6. |
Hares Torn to Pieces |
12. |
|
10.7. |
Hares Will Increase If Coursing Banned |
12. |
|
10.8. |
Coursing is Illegal |
13. |
|
10.9. |
Hare is Endangered Species |
13. |
|
10.10 |
13. |
|
|
11. |
13. |
1. ORIGINS
Deerhounds are the direct descendants of the hounds that accompanied the Celts as they migrated Westwards across Europe in the Bronze Age. Whilst it is not possible to be precise about the exact origin of the breed what has been established, from a wide variety of sources, is that in the North of Britain there has existed from remote times a breed of large, rough coated, sight-hound used to hunt Red Deer.
Deerhounds have not been regularly used for this purpose for well over a hundred years. The invention of firearms and in particular the development of the sporting rifle dealt a near fatal blow to the breed. Having previously enjoyed significant economic importance as the provider of venison to the tables of the Clan Chieftains the early 19th century found the breed at extremely low ebb.
Iimprovements in the design of the sporting rifle rendered it lighter, more certain of action and of much greater range. When the Napoleonic wars ended in 1815 the officers who returned home sought eagerly for an exciting sport, finding the new form of Deerstalking exactly to their taste. Highland landowners were not slow to recognise the opportunities of this development, dividing up the great forests into smaller portions and letting these to wealthy sportsmen. In 1812 there were estimated to be only five forests in Scotland. Less than a hundred years later there were one hundred and thirty. The Deerhound therefore became both superfluous and embarrassing. Recognising no boundaries he would pursue his stag onto adjacent ground upsetting both game and neighbourly relations.
No longer required for securing meat and out of favour for sporting purposes the Deerhound was facing disaster. The general spread of cultivated land and the coming of the Cheviot sheep further hastened his decline and only the direct intervention of a few sympathetic individuals rescued the breed from certain extinction. Thus the Deerhound teetered on the very edge for over half a century its population periodically ravaged by distemper until the late 19th century when the show arena provided a modest revival.
This newfound popularity undoubtedly provided a much-needed life raft at a time when such was desperately needed. It was not without inherent danger however as popularity can be a double-edged sword. With such a noble lineage the Deerhound is no mere fashion accessory and many of its supporters felt most strongly that the breed should not be allowed to degenerate into a mere decorative pet. It was agreed that the Deerhound should be preserved as a working breed and to this end in the early 1950s hare coursing was accepted as being both a legal and a practical use for Deerhounds employing at least some of their working capabilities. The main object was by so doing to avoid an over emphasis upon `show points` that has led to regrettable exaggerations in other breeds.
Today the Deerhound remains a rare breed with fewer than 2000 specimens in the UK and perhaps less than 5000 worldwide.
The Deerhound is a Kennel Club registered breed and many of the Champions in the show-ring are also winners on the coursing field. With dogs attaining a height at the shoulder of over 30 inches and a weight of more than 100 pounds the Deerhound is an animal of impressive appearance and one that has not significantly altered in over 200 years. It also remains remarkably free of any inherent faults in either its physique or its temperament a testament to the value of maintaining the Deerhound at work.
2. THE SPORT OF COURSING
Coursing enjoys a long and distinguished history world-wide and is deeply embedded in the culture and lore of the British countryside. Depictions of the sport can be found upon buildings and artefacts dating back 4000 years. By the first century BC the sport was popular in Britain and the consensus is that the Brown Hare not a native species - was imported here specifically for coursing purposes. The Duke of Norfolk drew up the first universally accepted rules for coursing for Queen Elizabeth 1st and most of these remain in use today.
Interestingly the sport of coursing has always been conspicuously differentiated from hunting with dogs by the very clearly stated declaration that the true and only purpose of coursing is to chase and not to catch hares. As long ago as AD 116 Flavius Arianus wrote " The true sportsman does not take out his dogs to destroy the hares, but for the sake of the course and is glad if the hare escapes". This sentiment has not diminished among coursing aficionados despite the passing of almost 2000 years.
3. COURSING WITH DEERHOUNDS
Deerhound coursing is conducted strictly under National Coursing Club (NCC) and Deerhound Coursing Club (DCC) rules. The latter come into play when the differences between Greyhounds and Deerhounds in, say speed, render the former inappropriate. In every instance these rules are designed to avoid any abuse of the sport itself, the participating hounds and most importantly the hare.
It must be borne in mind that the hare is not the Deerhounds natural quarry. It is perhaps not surprising therefore that the Deerhound finds itself neither fast nor agile enough to catch a healthy, adult hare especially as the rules insist that sufficient `law` must be given to the hare before the hounds are released. Deerhounds are designed to reach up and not down in order to secure their quarry and have difficulty in stooping to pick up a hare even when they are able to match its pace. As a consequence the kill rate for Deerhound coursing is very low at I 25 courses. Quite often entire coursing meetings pass by without a single kill as the following analysis of the last four coursing meetings shows:
| North Norfolk | 32 courses run | 2 hares killed |
| Mid Norfolk | 24 courses run | 1 hare killed |
| Cambridgeshire | 22 courses run | No hares killed |
| West Norfolk | 13 courses run | 1 hare killed |
| Total courses run | 91 | Total hares killed 4 |
It is noteworthy that when a hare is brought down any subsequent examination quite frequently reveals poor condition. Thus the Deerhound plays a modest but important role in ensuring `survival of the fittest` amongst the hare population and assisting the general health and wellbeing of its quarry in accordance with the law of nature.
3.1 Rules and Organisation
Deerhound coursing meetings are run in accordance with the stipulations of the NCC with licensed Judges and Slippers employed. In addition `pickers up` are appointed for each meeting whose task, should a hare be brought down, is to secure the hare and ensure that it is dead. On no occasion is the ground restricted in such a way as to impede the progress of the coursed hare and the Slipper strives to ensure that only healthy, adult hares are run. All hares are given the appropriate `law` or start before the Deerhounds are released.
The Deerhound Coursing Club (DCC) is a sub committee of The Deerhound Club the body that promotes the breed, defining and regulating the breed standard in accordance with Kennel Club regulations. The DCC is administered by an elected committee of 7 individuals of which 4 are also elected committee members of the parent organisation. The DCC is semi-autonomous, having its own Chairperson, Secretary Treasurer and members. It is accountable to the Deerhound Club but produces its own, separate audited accounts. Of the 500 individual UK members of the Deerhound Club, those who wish to course their Hounds subscribe to the DCC mailing list which gives notice of forthcoming meetings. The number of such subscribers averages around a hundred and currently stands at 76.
The DCC committee administers the day to day affairs of the club and act as stewards at the various coursing meetings. They also publish a calendar of each seasons coursing fixtures which involves 10 to 12 meetings annually each organised and managed by separate `Meetings Secretaries`. These individuals liaise with various landowners in order to obtain access to suitable ground. Under the guidance of the committee they determine the size and type of each `stake`, taking account of the hare population, crop variety and current land use etc.. They also select and appoint Judge and Slipper, organise the `pickers up` and deal with all matters relating to the meeting including arranging accommodation and subsistence for the above officials. In addition they liaise with gamekeepers to plan the strategy for the meeting and organise all payments, reimbursements and gifts.
It must be borne in mind that the Deerhound Coursing Club, although small, is a national organisation with national membership and coursing meetings occurring in the Highlands of Scotland and the Welsh Marches as well as in the traditional English coursing regions. Most of the clubs meetings are of long standing with fixtures having been held over many years.
3.2 Number of Courses Run
The number of courses run by Deerhounds thus far in the 1999 2000 coursing season is 153. The total number of courses run by Deerhounds in the 1997 98 and in the 1998 99 was 236 and 219 respectively.
Evening out the number of courses run each season to an average of 230 and applying the established and verifiable ratio of one hare killed for every 25 courses run it can be deduced that Deerhound coursing accounts for under a dozen Brown Hares annually. The perceived negative impact of the sport is therefore negligible and is more than offset by the conservation benefits.
SEPTEMBER
24 & 25 Aberdeenshire 32 hound stake walked up
OCTOBER
9 Cambridgeshire 16 hound stake walked up
23 Lincolnshire 16 hound stake walked up
NOVEMBER
5 & 6 Scottish Borders 32 hound stake walked up
DECEMBER
12 South Lincolnshire 16 hound stake walked up
JANUARY
8 North Norfolk 24 hound stake driven
15 Mid Norfolk 16 hound stake walked up
29 Cambridgeshire 16 hound stake walked up
FEBRUARY
5 West Norfolk 16 hound stake walked up
11 & 12 North Lincolnshire 32 hound stake walked up
26 Worcestershire 16 hound stake walked up
MARCH
3 & 4 Aberdeenshire 32 hound stake walked up
In addition to the above a whole series of related social events support the coursing activity including formal and informal dinners, seminars, lectures and other gatherings.
Deerhound coursing forms the hub around which the vast majority of the membership derives its annual social activity.
The season culminates with the annual club dinner at which the coursing trophies for the current season are presented. This event regularly attracts over 250 members and guests of which a considerable number will be overseas members.
3.4 Deerhound Coursing Trophies
A list of the trophies for which hounds compete at various meetings throughout the season is as follows:
ARDKINGLAS TROPHY (Miss Noble)
For the winner of most points during the season
DUCHALLY BELL (Mrs Edmunds)
For the winner of most courses during the season
DUCHALLY TROPHY (Mrs Edmunds)
For runner up to winner of most courses during the season
DUCHALLY CUP (Mrs Edmunds)
For veteran winner of most courses during the season
THE DARK SHADOW TROPHY (Mr & Mrs R Williams)
For the hound winning the most courses who starts the season aged under two years
Meeting Donor For
CAMBRIDGESHIRE
Ardkinglas Cup (Miss Noble) Winner
Sapphire Bowl (Mr & Mrs Cook) Runner Up
Enterkine Cup (Miss Bell) Purse Winner
Gordon Brooks Trophy (Mr Green) Plate Winner
Veteran Cup (Miss Noble) Best Veteran
SCOTTISH BORDERS
Dava Quaich (Mr Cassels) Winner
Portsonachan Salver (Mrs Young) Runner Up
Ardkinglas Beaker (Miss Noble) Purse Winner
Quicksilver Cup (Mr & Mrs Giles) Plate Winner
Bunlorum Cup (Mr Moore) Best Veteran
NORTH LINCOLNSHIRE
Jacqueline Bedford Memorial Salver (Mr Bedford) Bitch Winner
Guy Bedford Trophy (Mrs Bedford) Dog Winner
The Gilaval Trophy (Mr Cassells) Purse Winner
CAMBRIDGESHIRE
Lochindorb Plate (Mr & Mrs Gow) Winner
Duchally Plaque (Mrs Edmunds) Runner Up
MID NORFOLK
Kylewood Cup (Dr & Mrs Shaw) Winner
WEST NORFOLK
Doune Cromach (Mr Hill) Winner
Intershare Trophy (Mr & Mrs W Mathews) Runner Up
NORTH NORFOLK
Lochindorb Flask (Mr & Mrs Kermack) Winner
ABERDEENSHIRE
Mac and Rory Trophy (Brigadier & Mrs Dunn) Winner
Glengarrioch Shield (Mr MacIntosh) Runner Up
All of the above are managed by a Trophy Steward appointed by the Committee and are presented at the annual Breed Show of the Deerhound Club.
Whilst there exists no statutory close season for the hare the DCC strictly observes the NCC imposed close season which is designed to conserve the species by providing no disturbance as a result of coursing between 11 March and 14 September in any year.
4. KEEPING COURSING DEERHOUNDS
Hare coursing remains the only legitimate and viable test of the modern, working Deerhound. Unlike some other coursing breeds Deerhounds react fairly indifferently to an artificial lure and have proved rather too easily distracted for track racing. Whilst they will often pursue an artificial hare for a short while they demonstrate little real enthusiasm and nothing approaching the single minded determination produced by a live quarry. Thus no viable alternative to coursing presents itself, which would not result in a gradual degrading of the instinct and physical attributes of the breed. One needs look no further than the modern Wolfhound to see what can happen when a working animal becomes an ornament.
Breeding and training working Deerhounds requires high levels of commitment. A vast amount of time, expertise, industry and expense are required to rear and train successful hounds. A Deerhound puppy can be purchased for around £500 but there exists no specific market for coursing animals. Only exceptionally rarely does an adult or `sapling` Deerhound change ownership and never for reasons of gain. Similarly no betting or wagering of any description is tolerated at coursing meetings and no prize money is awarded.
The Deerhound is a large breed and has very precise requirements. Whilst their temperament is unrivalled Deerhounds are often referred to as "the best kept secret in the canine world" they nevertheless demand an accommodation, dietary and exercise regime that would not shame a human athlete. A survey of Coursing Club members reveals that it costs somewhere between one thousand and fifteen hundred pounds to maintain a working Deerhound. However in order to ensure that one `match-ready` hound can be entered at any meeting the owner will need to keep three. Fitness problems, injuries and for bitches, seasons, demand this. In addition the working life of a Deerhound at competitive level is no more than two to three years and so one must always be `bringing on` new blood. The keenest coursing members keep five or even more hounds. Whilst these individual members would probably stay within the breed if coursing were to be banned they would have no requirement to keep more than one animal. It can be deduced that somewhere in the region of 150 Deerhounds are currently being maintained by coursing owners at a total annual expenditure of about £250,000 and that were coursing to be banned this figure would be dramatically reduced.
It must be stressed that when, for any reason a Deerhound comes to the end of its working life it is merely retired. None are euthinased or re-homed or otherwise disposed of.
5. THE DEERHOUND COURSING MEMBERS
The Deerhound coursing community is small but in no way exclusive. The only stipulation for full participation is that one must own a pure-bred,KC registered Deerhound and be prepared to abide by NCC and DCC rules. The joining fee is deliberately kept low at £10 per annum in order to present no obstacle to those wishing to take part. All meetings are run on a `costs recovery only` basis with a modest entry fee for each hound. Anyone who so wishes may attend a meeting provided they pay a `spectators fee` of £5 per day.
Membership is made up of a disparate range of different people from widely varying age groups and backgrounds. There are students, Doctors, Teachers, Refuse Collectors, Lawyers, Labourers, Secretaries, Police Officers, Factory Workers, Soldiers, Pensioners and Unemployed people. Most are ordinary, honest people. They are pretty evenly balanced between men and women with a smattering of children too! All regularly mix and socialise together without hindrance. On an individual level extremely strong bonds of friendship are forged, that transcend social barriers. The unifying factor is a love of the countryside, a deep affection for the quarry species and a passion to preserve an historic running hound. In almost every case coursing is the primary interest of each member with the whole of their social activity deriving from it.
6. THE DEERHOUND COURSING MEETINGS
All DCC meetings are held at the invitation of the landowners, farmers and tenants. Most are regular, annual events with some meetings being held at the same venue for over 30 years.
In every instance hares are preserved on the ground for coursing purposes and are therefore abundant. This results from careful habitat management and predator control and is in marked contrast to those areas where coursing does not occur on nature reserves for example where the hare fares very badly indeed.
Only where field sports are practised and most especially where coursing occurs - are the proprietors and custodians of the ground prepared to do what is necessary to maintain good hare populations. Interestingly there is also a wealth of anecdotal evidence to suggest that not only are hares more abundant on coursing land but they are also heavier an accepted barometer of general health and well-being in mammals and therefore fitter. This last is the opinion not only of many experienced coursing enthusiasts but also and most especially of NCC licensed Slippers too. It must be borne in mind that these Slippers are trained and experienced in determining whether or not a hare is fit to be run and know their job well. This area warrants some serious scientific investigation.
There are two types of Deerhound coursing meeting - `driven` and `walked-up`. There is usually only one driven meeting each season. The Deerhound Coursing Club is unique in the fact that nearly all of its meetings are `walked up`.
7. DESCRIPTION OF A WALKED-UP COURSING MEETING
In order to find and flush a hare all participants walk line abreast across open country with their dogs securely leashed. Ahead of the line walks the NCC licensed Slipper with a pair of hounds in `slips`, a type of double leash, which ensures that both hounds can be released simultaneously. The hounds in slips wear a red or a white collar respectively to enable them to be distinguished at a distance one from the other. Adjacent to the line there will be an NCC licensed Judge, mounted on a horse and ready to `score` any course by awarding points to each hound for their speed and agility in chasing and turning the hare. In Deerhound coursing no points are awarded for killing a hare.
When a hare is flushed the line halts and the Slipper must decide if it is an adult hare and fit to course. If it is he must then make sure that both hounds have seen the hare and that the appropriate `law`t is given. Only then must he evenly release the hounds.
Coursing is a knock out competition with the winner of each course going into the next round to meet the winner of the succeeding course until only one remains. The hounds are judged one against the other by a system of points first codified in the 16th century. These are based upon:
Speed over the first part of the course from when the hounds are slipped until they close up on the hare.
Forcing the hare to make a 90 degree turn to throw off pursuit.
Forcing the hare to make a part turn
A hound coming from clear behind to clear in front of the other and going on to force a wrench or turn.
Throughout each course the appointed `pickers up` for the meeting, having already positioned themselves in readiness are following its progress, prepared to immediately assist any hare that is brought down.
The Judge, having followed the running hounds and made a decision will signal the end of the course by showing either a red or a white flag to denote the winning hounds `collar`. An appointed flag steward will reflect the result to `the field`, the line and spectators, by holding aloft a large flag of the same colour. The appointed `card steward` then logs the result and calls up the next pair of hounds to slips. Throughout this whole period the line must remain still and quiet. Should the hare attempt to run past or back through the line no attempt must be made to distract or impede it. The appointed stewards for the meeting ensure compliance from all present.
A Deerhound course that endures for two minutes is considered to be exceptionally long. It must also be borne in mind that all coursing hounds follow their quarry by sight alone. Therefore the hare has only to place itself out of view for an instant in order to escape. Hedgerows, tall grass, crops, or sometimes even the spectators themselves provide sufficient cover to enable the hare to make clean away.
8. DESCRIPTION OF A DRIVEN COURSING MEETING
A team of beaters drives hares from adjacent farmland onto the coursing field where the Slipper has positioned himself behind a `shy` or some other form of cover. The rest of the field and spectators are located at the edge of the running ground. Hares are flushed in such a way as to cause them to approach the `shy` from behind. The Slipper judges the hares condition as they run past him before releasing the hounds in the normal way.
Meetings or `stakes`, whether driven or walked-up are usually for 32 or 16 hounds with the occasional 24 hound stake organised. Wherever possible the `main stake` is accompanied by separate minor stakes for beaten hounds. These are `the plate` and `the purse` for first and second round losers respectively.
9. THE ECONOMICS OF DEERHOUND COURSING
Members wishing to run a hound at any meeting are charged an entry fee to cover the expenses related to putting on the event. The licensed officials required are all paid a professional fee for their services. They are also accommodated, entertained and have their travel costs reimbursed by DCC. Similarly all gamekeepers, beaters and drivers are paid a daily fee. The expenses incurred at a typical driven meeting are as follows:
NORTH NORFOLK MEETING Jan 2000
Fees and Services:
Judge £150
Slipper £ 80
Horse £ 80
Keepers £100
Beaters £800
Gifts £ 37
Total = £1247.00
Members Expenditure:
Entries £600
Spectators £25
Fines £5
Travelling £750 (estimated)
Hotels/meals £1200 (estimated)
Total = £2580.00
Leaving aside the cost of beaters - which would only apply to the single driven meeting held each season - the sums quoted above are typical of every one-day Deerhound coursing meeting. Taking the two-day meetings into account therefore and remembering that on some occasions a fee for access to the ground is levied it is possible to extrapolate that DCC contributes approximately £100K into the rural economy both directly and indirectly each season. The two-day events are particularly popular with an average of 60 supporters all of whom stay for three nights in rural hotels. In addition they traditionally attract up to 20 overseas enthusiasts from Canada, USA and Europe. It should also be noted that the subsistence and accommodation element of this expenditure occurs in the `out of season` period so vital for the survival of small rural businesses.
Furthermore there is an estimated £100K of `local purchases` made by rural dwelling members the overwhelming majority - in support of the provisioning and upkeep of their coursing kennels. Then there are veterinary fees and protective clothing. It is therefore estimated that the total `spend` in respect of Deerhound coursing is almost £500K annually not including any capital costs such as the hounds themselves or any proportion of the real estate occupied by them.
10. DEERHOUND COURSING SOME MISAPPREHENSIONS
10.1 Deerhound coursing is irrelevant
No it is not. As has been demonstrated above Deerhound coursing is a genuine, if modest, net contributor to the rural economy. It is vital in ensuring the future well being of a rare breed and is of positive benefit in conservation terms to hares. It also forms a complex conduit through which members and supporters can interface with the countryside and connect with the rich tapestry of their rural cultural birthright.
10.2 Deerhound coursing is cruel
No it is not. Coursing contains no cruelty whatsoever. The hare is either killed outright or gets clean away. No hare is ever injured as a result of coursing and only a tiny minority are killed. In many cases these later prove to be unhealthy in some degree. Coursing is hugely beneficial to the hare population.
10.3 The hares are released from boxes
No they are not. Only fully wild hares are coursed. These are located by `walking up` and run over ground with which they are entirely familiar. They have greater speed and stamina than their pursuers and have the added advantage of a long head start.
10.4 All of the avenues of escape are blocked
No they are not. No impeding of the hare is allowed in any form.
10.5 The hare often dies of exhaustion after being coursed
No it does not. A fit and healthy hare easily out-paces and out-manoeuvres a Deerhound. Also the fittest and healthiest hares are to be found where coursing is practised.
10.6 The hare is often torn to pieces whilst still alive
No it is not. No one in the DCC can recall ever seeing a hare torn between two hounds. Deerhounds are extremely strong animals weighing 80 to 100 pounds. They are evolved to pull down stags and their jaws are hugely powerful. It is not logical to assume that any small quarry taken at speed, by the neck or back, by a coursing Deerhound will not be killed instantly.
10.7 The hare population would increase if coursing were banned
No it would not. Quite the reverse would occur and the hare would seriously decline as it has in every area where coursing does not occur. The hare is an agricultural pest that is tolerated and encouraged for its sporting value. If coursing were to be banned hares would be shot and snared to reduce their numbers. It is noteworthy that whilst the populations of game birds are regularly replenished no shoot in the UK puts down hares to replace those shot. Only in coursing areas are hares fully protected and occasionally re-stocked.
10.8 Hare coursing is illegal
No it is not. Properly organised coursing, conducted under rules and with the permission of the landowner or tenant is perfectly legal. Going onto land without permission to kill hares with dogs is poaching which has always been illegal. A ban on coursing would merely serve to abolish an ancient sport, which is being conducted responsibly and beneficially. Illegal poaching would simply continue as it does today and because of this a banning of proper coursing would simply serve to worsen the situation for the hare, which would lose its protection.
10.9 The hare is an endangered species
No it is not. The hare is a common mammal that in some areas constitutes a serious agricultural pest. If you do not see many hares it is probably because you live in an area where no coursing takes place. Anyone who joins a walked up Deerhound coursing meeting will see hares in abundance.
10.10 Coursing results in packs of dangerous dogs running loose
No it does not. Deerhounds are not dangerous and pose no threat when coursing. No other hounds are ever released until the last coursing pair has been recovered. Deerhounds are unique amongst coursing breeds in that they always return to their owners immediately after their course has ended. Owners of any accidentally `loose` hound are fined half their membership fee! - on the spot.
11. DEERHOUND COURSING THE MEMBERS VIEW
Finally we offer two concluding we believe conclusive arguments. One based upon the preservation of freedoms and another based upon the preservation of a life style now sadly out of favour with the urban majority.
Coursing enthusiasts paradoxically do not seek to kill. Those who course do so for the archaic pleasure of the pursuit not for the blood lust of the kill. Observe the field when hounds are running. Who calls for the death of the hare? No one. Listen rather to the silence if a hare is brought down; see the subdued demeanour of all present.
Observe also the partisan support of the quarry by those who have devoted their lives to its pursuit. Hear the spontaneous shout of "Go on the hare!" whenever a course is close run. See, if you will the absolute determination that no suffering will result from a hare being brought down.
Then there are the rights of we humans. If we must concern ourselves with the rights of our fellow creatures, surely the Rights of Man must claim precedence?
The argument that a civilised society would not permit hunting with dogs seems at first sight a powerful one. But - and leaving aside the observation that if this argument is to be taken even half seriously then all forms of hunting must be included we must surely also ask what kind of civilised society is it that seeks to use the fullest extent of its legal powers to control the activities of its citizens at such a miserly and mean spirited level? If the concept of freedom under the law means anything at all it must surely protect the freedom of the individual to follow any path he or she chooses which does not seriously impinge upon the equivalent freedom of others.
In a democratic state the majority is potentially all-powerful. The difference between the use of this power and the application of similar power by a dictatorship lies not only in the source of its legitimacy but also in the manner of its application to minorities. In Britain we hold dear the protection of free speech and enforce the rights of individuals to hold and express their views even when these are offensive to any civilised person. How much more important then is the right to freedom of action?
Date uploaded to site 27 March 2000